<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cancer &#8211; Reduce Your Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthyfellow.com/153/cancer-reduce-your-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthyfellow.com/153/cancer-reduce-your-risk/</link>
	<description>Your Natural Health Critic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.healthyfellow.com/153/cancer-reduce-your-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthyfellow.com/?p=153#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the interesting links, Iggy. 

Be well!

JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting links, Iggy. </p>
<p>Be well!</p>
<p>JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iggy Dalrymple</title>
		<link>http://www.healthyfellow.com/153/cancer-reduce-your-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Iggy Dalrymple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthyfellow.com/?p=153#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Recent studies have suggested that the optimal vitamin D blood concentration for most adults is at least 75 nmol/l and that elderly people might need at least 100 nmol/l (see Vitamin D: What&#039;s Enough?). In the NHANES analysis, fewer than 40 percent of people had D blood concentrations of at least 75 nmol/l.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/6916/title/Food_for_Thought__Breathing_Easier_with_Vitamin_D



Because humans evolved at equatorial latitudes, without modern clothing and shelter, their vitamin D supply would have been equivalent to at least 100 μg day-1 (4000 units day-1). Thus, the human genome was selected for under conditions where the circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration was greater than 100 nmol l-1. This contrasts with modern humans in whom serum 25(OH)D is typically half that.   http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/cjne/2001/00000011/00000004/art00006?crawler=true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent studies have suggested that the optimal vitamin D blood concentration for most adults is at least 75 nmol/l and that elderly people might need at least 100 nmol/l (see Vitamin D: What&#8217;s Enough?). In the NHANES analysis, fewer than 40 percent of people had D blood concentrations of at least 75 nmol/l.<br />
<a href="http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/6916/title/Food_for_Thought__Breathing_Easier_with_Vitamin_D" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/6916/title/Food_for_Thought__Breathing_Easier_with_Vitamin_D</a></p>
<p>Because humans evolved at equatorial latitudes, without modern clothing and shelter, their vitamin D supply would have been equivalent to at least 100 μg day-1 (4000 units day-1). Thus, the human genome was selected for under conditions where the circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration was greater than 100 nmol l-1. This contrasts with modern humans in whom serum 25(OH)D is typically half that.   <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/cjne/2001/00000011/00000004/art00006?crawler=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/cjne/2001/00000011/00000004/art00006?crawler=true</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

