Agave Danger!
March 25, 2009 Written by JP
[Download PDF]
[Font too small?]
As you’ve probably gathered I’m a big supporter of the natural health industry. On the whole I believe they promote a healthier society by providing alternative options for an increasingly toxic world. However on occasion I need to point out areas in which I disagree with certain prevailing notions within the industry. Today I’m going to discuss one disturbing trend with regard to the promotion of a natural sweetener called agave nectar (or syrup).
Most people are familiar with agave when it takes the form of tequila. But over the past few years, this succulent plant has been used to manufacture a “healthy” sweetener. There are several reasons why it has been designated as such: 1) It’s often grown organically, 2) It ranks lower on the glycemic index than many other sweeteners – which possibly means a lesser impact on blood sugar levels, 3) It’s an exotic and novel ingredient.
So what’s so harmful about an exotic, organically grown plant that has a milder effect on blood sugar levels? I can answer that question in one word: fructose. Fructose is a simple sugar found in many fruits and vegetables. It’s also one of the most controversial ingredients currently found in the food supply – when it’s used as a concentrated sweetener.
Perhaps you’ve heard of a food additive called high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). This is a sweetening agent that is found in many pre-packaged and refined foods. Scientific research has linked HFCS to a number of health consequences, such as: diabetes, high triglycerides, metabolic syndrome and even gout. HFCS is now generally considered the worst offender in the realm of sweeteners. Its has reached the status that trans-fats (hydrogenated fats) have obtained in the world of dietary fat sources.
As bad as HFCS is, it doesn’t hold a candle to agave syrup. The following nutritional analysis will help to explain why:
- HFCS typically contains about 42% to 55% fructose.
- Agave syrup can contain in excess of 90% fructose.
- For comparisons sake, honey contains about 40% fructose.
In addition to those disturbing facts, there is also another issue worth considering. Does agave possess any other properties that would somehow make it worth using? One recent experiment analyzed the relative quantities of antioxidants in several sugar alternatives. The following findings were published in the January 2009 edition of the Journal of American Dietetic Association:
- The sweeteners with the highest antioxidant scores were: blackstrap and dark molasses.
- Sweeteners with mid-range antioxidant scores were: honey and maple syrup.
- Agave, corn syrup and refined sugar provided the weakest antioxidant effects.

This matters in the real world because scientific evidence is telling us that high fructose consumption may play a significant role in the current diabetic and obesity epidemics. A reminder was just published in the March issue of the journal Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. Researchers from The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine examined 9 years of laboratory work relating to the role that fructose plays on the brain.
In essence, what they found was that fructose stimulates the desire to eat more. Glucose, another common form of sugar, did not show the same effect. This finding provoked the following response from M. Daniel Lane, one the scientists involved in this study, “We feel that these findings may have particular relevance to the massive increase in the use of high fructose sweeteners (both high fructose corn syrup and table sugar) in virtually all sweetened foods, most notably soft drinks. The per capita consumption of these sweeteners in the USA is about 145 lbs/year and is probably much higher in teenagers/youth that have a high level of consumption of soft drinks.”
The moral of the story? We should never simply accept that something is healthful just because it’s natural. Ultimately, we’re the guardians of what goes into and stays out of our bodies. Being as informed as possible will help us avoid missteps like the one promoted by (otherwise good) manufacturers that use agave in their products. We can even take this one step further and contact said manufacturers and express concern about this trend. This may help to hasten the shift from unhealthy sugar substitutes, such as agave syrup.
Personally, I don’t use a lot of sweeteners in my diet. But when I choose to, I opt for pure stevia. There’s a great deal of scientific and traditional evidence to support its safety. The commercial availability and ease of use for stevia products will improve in the coming months and years. It’s popularity is growing and the restrictions on its sale are also relaxing. I think stevia is a step in the right direction for anyone who is looking for the safest sweetening option out there.
Be well!
JP
Related Posts:
Tags: Agave, Fructose, Stevia
Posted in Nutrition

March 26th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Interesting article. I usually also recommend Stevia as the best sweetener, possibly. Once I used Agave, but really I never use sugar, brown sugar, fructose or any sweetener. I tend to use cinnamon so much as I can since it improves insulin sensitivity. Congrats for your blog, hugs from Europe.
March 26th, 2009 at 3:24 pm
I’m a big cinnamon fan myself, David.
Thanks for commenting and continued health.
Be well!
JP
May 15th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
I understand the recommendation of stevia. But I personally find it tastes nasty and has as strong a chemical after-taste as aspartame. Thankfully, I have no problem doing without sweeteners. And if I bake (on rare occassions), I just use lesser amounts of sugar. But I don’t have diabetes, so I can afford a tiny bit of sugar every now and then.
May 15th, 2009 at 12:35 pm
Karen,
I’ve found that stevia products can vary quite dramatically in taste. After some experimentation, I’ve discovered some without any significant aftertaste. It’s all about trial and error, I think. In the future, as the stevia market grows, I think it’ll be easier to find a consistently reliable source that provides adequate sweetness and flavor.
Be well!
JP
February 6th, 2010 at 9:29 am
Is there any scientific research to back up your concern with agave nectar in particular? All the research you cite here is with high fructose corn syrup.
February 6th, 2010 at 2:14 pm
Good day, Lindsey.
A recent animal study found that agave raises triglycerides levels – an established risk factor for heart disease.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T0P-4XCYJF8-1&_user=10&_coverDate=12%2F07%2F2009&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=3cde51f41acec89470055b154184ad70
Then there’s the study I cited (in the column) that found that agave has a low antioxidant value – comparable to that of corn syrup and refined sugar.
http://www.adajournal.org/article/S0002-8223%2808%2901891-9/abstract
Beyond that, it’s really my overall concern about the total fructose content of agave that troubles me.
http://journals.lww.com/co-lipidology/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2010&issue=02000&article=00009&type=abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2805058/?tool=pubmed
http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/abstract/139/11/2067
Be well!
JP
April 25th, 2010 at 3:42 pm
Thanks for the info. It is hard to find neutral sources on “health” foods. I had recently purchased agave syrup as I had heard the hype! Good to know that a little sucrose is better – look where we are now where refined sugar is considered natural! (and promoted as such) which Stevia preparations do you recommend- otherwise I think it will be maple syrup for me.
Thanks
April 25th, 2010 at 8:23 pm
Thank you, Donna.
Agave syrup is the latest “it” item at health food stores. It’s too bad but it’s true. I’m not in favor of this trend.
At the moment, I’m using two different stevia products: Soooo Sweet! and Now Foods Organic Stevia with Inulin.
Speaking of maple syrup, I also use a sugar-free maple syrup that’s sweetened with xylitol (a natural sugar alcohol derived from birch trees and/or corn). It’s manufactured by Nature’s Hollow.
Be well!
JP
August 4th, 2010 at 7:35 am
Thanks for the info. I have one question, though. Is the fructose in HFCS identical to that of agave? I know the fructose of HFCS has to process through the liver. Is this always true of any fructose?
August 4th, 2010 at 10:57 am
Larry,
It can be said that agave undergoes less processing the HFCS. But for all intents and purposes, the fructose component is the same. This would apply to any form of fructose but would obviously be affected by the percentage of fructose and other components that can impact fructose utilization – example: fiber and select phytochemicals in fruits and vegetables.
Be well!
JP
August 14th, 2010 at 11:26 am
The Weston A. Price Foundation, Dr. Joseph Mercola, MD, and Nexxus Magazine have all written extensively on the agave consumer fraud, as well as the FDA having succesfully criminally prosecuted this NON GRAS (Generally Recognize As Safe), unapproved, miscarriage causing, red blood cell membrane destroying, falsely labeled sweetener, that is “hydrolyzed high fructose inulin syrup”, per FDA, that causes obesity, cardio vascular disease, even at low levels, and is extremely harmful to diabetcs and any health compromised ingestees. Agave is not natural, naturally occurring, raw, organic, kosher, hala, or safe, period…it is a criminal consumer FRAUD.